Nintendo should do more Pokemon games agree or disagree?

And by that I don't mean Pokemon Z if that what next coming up well hoping it does anyways, I am still confused why it's letters now instead of colours anyone know why they've done that or run out of colours to use? lol

Anyways Pokemon what we know and love, I was hoping for a remake for the trading card game and the pinball, I already know you can buy the old versions on the eshop with only some of them but be nice to see a remake for the newest console NX or the 3DS. I know Pokemon Link as come back and simple love that game to bits from the DS version but I think they should remake the very old version games they did with pokemon instead of just dungeon game they always do.

Also maybe we will see the next Wii U game of Pokemon: Battle Revolution as they always seem to do that following from the gamecube and Wii version don't wouldn't be surprised that will be coming in the future. Would anyone buy any of these games if they make them? It's in HD so can't say no to it and remakes are always good ideas with some games out there. Any suggestions what pokemon games you would like to see back? pokemon puzzle or snap? Or you think naahh wouldn't work just waste of time, no one would be buying it and be all for nothing.

I think the spinoffs are heading in a good direction, there are a lot more "notable" spin-offs these days like Pokken Tournament and that rumoured Pikachu Detective game. Substantial stuff, rather than something knocked up with the Pokémon Brand.

Still, it'd be nice if Nintendo's golden developers tackled Pokémon again.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Pokken as a NX launch game that be big.

Odd that we've not seen an attempt at a proper Pokemon RPG on home consoles since the Colosseum games. The demand is there - it's one of the most talked about concepts in gaming, and I'm sure it'd sell.

The Pokemon Company answer to that it's a handheld game yet it's becoming more like a console game with each version.

I mean, yeah, I associate the series with handheld and you'd be crazy not to do so, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on home consoles.

I've given up trying to understand the Pokémon Company. Did you know that their amiibi are the only ones that don't work properly with YWW? Why? What does that gain them?

I'd like to see Pokken, Colosseum 3/XD2, and Pokémon Stadium 3 all come to Nintendo home consoles. I imagine that only the first one will happen. I don't understand why that is the case.

If they do release another Pokémon spin-off, it'll probably be another F2P game of the kind that I have absolutely no interest in. So I probably disagree, at least while the Spindas at the top of the Pokémon Company are in charge.

Personally I just want another Battle Stadium myself, a proper console game where you competed in tournaments and various challenges and earned rewards that expanded your handheld stuff like Pokemon with special moves (Surf Pikachu please!) and hard to get or currently unavailable items (for the love of god give us back our Type Gems already!)

Balladeer wrote:

I've given up trying to understand the Pokémon Company.  Did you know that their amiibi are the only ones that don't work properly with YWW?  Why?  What does that gain them?  

I'd like to see Pokken, Colosseum 3/XD2, and Pokémon Stadium 3 all come to Nintendo home consoles.  I imagine that only the first one will happen.  I don't understand why that is the case.

If they do release another Pokémon spin-off, it'll probably be another F2P game of the kind that I have absolutely no interest in.  So I probably disagree, at least while the Spindas at the top of the Pokémon Company are in charge.

I am not sure why it wouldn't work but the others do, all I can think of is the pokemon company didn't want it work on YWW and they would prefer it if you use them with super smash bros of the purpose of it and using them as a collectible item of a figure. The high demand for jigglypuff is finally here for fans.

What happened to digimon with gaming? Wasn't it the last game on the PS1? that long gone and history no one seems to question about them.
I think pokemon killed digimon when it was out and it was for more boys than girls which didn't include everyone in the market like pokemon did

JayMoyles wrote:

I mean, yeah, I associate the series with handheld and you'd be crazy not to do so, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on home consoles.

They always were more famously know towards the handheld since red/blue come out and they like to keep there games like that on handheld
they would do overly a Wii U game but only the one time, the others would be handheld for sure and nothing else, they will never change that.

Balladeer wrote:

I've given up trying to understand the Pokémon Company.  Did you know that their amiibi are the only ones that don't work properly with YWW?  Why?  What does that gain them?

I saw that - just a lame blank Amiibo costume instead, right? Why?

Now that Nintendo is working towards putting tailored experiences on smartphones by the end of the year, with five games planned by April 2017, I have a bad feeling about what The Pokémon Company might do. Iwata doesn't want to make smartphone games that try to get a 'certain kind of player' to spend a lot of money, yet The Pokémon Company's F2P games have elements to encourage this.

While Nintendo chases "Free-to-Start" and more fairly distributed ways of monetising their smartphone games, The Pokémon Company might undo all that goodwill by releasing something more traditional in the F2P space. Which would be a shame -- many associate Pokémon Shuffle with Nintendo, not TPC.

JayMoyles wrote:

I mean, yeah, I associate the series with handheld and you'd be crazy not to do so, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on home consoles.

It would work but Nintendo don't need to do it.

They know Pokémon sells. Be if on a handheld or home console. It's easier/cheaper for them to keep churning out handheld games which will continue to sell. Why invest more time and money into developing a full on console game when the consumers are happy enough with what we get.

Everyone needs to boycott the handheld games and force Nintendo into making a change.

There are some spin-offs worth continuing/resurrecting but some have possibly outstayed their welcomes or, as fronky hinted, were never of the right quality in the first place. I'd like them to drop Rumble-ing for a little while, for example, but so many people want another Snap/Stadium/XD that they really should get out there and sort it out.

Not that they will, of course!

Dead Lemon wrote:

JayMoyles wrote:

I mean, yeah, I associate the series with handheld and you'd be crazy not to do so, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on home consoles.

It would work but Nintendo don't need to do it.

They know Pokémon sells. Be if on a handheld or home console. It's easier/cheaper for them to keep churning out handheld games which will continue to sell. Why invest more time and money into developing a full on console game when the consumers are happy enough with what we get.

Everyone needs to boycott the handheld games and force Nintendo into making a change.

It's not Nintendo though it's The Pokemon Company who are free to do what they want.

A new Snap game seems like a no-brainer for Wii U, and it'd do amazingly well too.

masofdas wrote:

Dead Lemon wrote:

JayMoyles wrote:

I mean, yeah, I associate the series with handheld and you'd be crazy not to do so, but I don't see why it wouldn't work on home consoles.

It would work but Nintendo don't need to do it.

They know Pokémon sells. Be if on a handheld or home console. It's easier/cheaper for them to keep churning out handheld games which will continue to sell. Why invest more time and money into developing a full on console game when the consumers are happy enough with what we get.

Everyone needs to boycott the handheld games and force Nintendo into making a change.

It's not Nintendo though it's The Pokemon Company who are free to do what they want.

correct, it's up to the pokemon company do when they want and how they want it not nintendo

JayMoyles wrote:

A new Snap game seems like a no-brainer for Wii U, and it'd do amazingly well too.

Yeah I agree lol you should see card captor sakura on the dreamcast
it's just like pokemon snap rofl it would make some money on the Wii U for sure.

Same argument applies. Pokemon Company continue to make money with out the need to spend more money/time on a home console game.

If you know your going to make decent money from doing the same thing there's no point in taking the risk and investing resources into something else.

The spinoff games we do get aren't as full a game as the main series so likely don't take up too much in the way of resources. Creating a full on home console 3d entry into the series would.

Take more time and money to reach a lower audience as there's already a bigger market for the handheld games. It's just not good business sense to deviate from the current strategy.

Every business needs to take risks occasionally, or their product will stagnate. They'll come a time when TPC will make a full 3D Pokémon home console RPG thing, but only when the alternative would be bankruptcy.

I was going to say that all of the Pokémon spin-offs are quite good, but that would be me forgetting PokéPark, Rumble, Ranger and Mystery Dungeon. Just do us another Pinball, Stadium, Snap and Puzzle and all will be well.

fronkhead wrote:

Hm, now that I remember it, The Pokémon Company were almost certainly behind Pokémon Shuffle and Pokémon Rumble F2P Edition.

Now that Nintendo is distinctly putting smartphone experiences on smartphones, I have a bad feeling about what The Pokémon Company might do. Iwata doesn't want to make smartphone games that try to get a 'certain kind of player' to spend a lot of money, yet The Pokémon Company's F2P games have elements to encourage this.

While Nintendo chases "Free-to-Start" and more fairly distributed ways of monetising their smartphone games, The Pokémon Company might undo all that goodwill by releasing something more traditional in the F2P space. Which would be a shame -- many associate Pokémon Shuffle with Nintendo, not TPC.

Ugh, Pokémon Shuffle got announced for iOS/Android today.

Kinda had a feeling they would

vomit.gif

It had better not be one of the five magic mobile games that Nintendo foretold...